University of Maine at Fort Kent Rocks and Tectonic Setting Questions – Description
Part A
Minimum of 525 words:
Consider the policy that started in 2018 that separated thousands of migrant children from their parents when they crossed the southern border. What kinds of policies are acceptable and unacceptable in the United States? How should moral arguments be weighed in such decisions? How might one define what is moral and what is not?
Think of an example where you have seen a policy change.
What forces drove this change?
Was it because an evaluation showed that something was not working correctly? If so, what information was brought to bear to argue for the change?
Was it mainly political?
What was altered in the political process to make the change?
PART B
Minimum of 525 words:
Review the 2 contrasting think tank positions on gun control presented in the “Steps to Analysis” box on pages 211–212.
Which do you think is more persuasive? Explain your answer.
Should policy analyses try to deal with the fundamental causes of social problems, such as crime, poverty, and homelessness, or aim instead for a more pragmatic approach that may be more realistic and more politically acceptable? Explain your position.
Exam Content
. In the field, you will encounter policies that affect groups of people or even whole populations. It will be incumbent upon you to objectively evaluate these effects. For this assignment, you will select a policy that lies at the center of your analysis in this course. The policy you choose will be the same policy through Week Six. Do not deviate from your chosen policy; you must use the same policy in subsequent assignments. Please send me a copy of or a link to your chosen policy before proceeding with this assignment. Select one of the following socially charged policies:
Welfare and Social Security
Your supervisor has asked you to make a presentation to the task force examining the policy that you intend to analyze. You will work on this presentation throughout the course. Prepare a 15- to 20-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation in which you critique the policy in terms of justice and security. The first slide needs to contain the title of your presentation. The second slide should introduce the potential stakeholders. The rest of the slides should answer the following:
How did the policy develop in terms of Money, Message, and Momentum? (Three slides.)
How has the policy evolved since inception?
What are some alternatives to this policy?
What is influencing the discussion around this policy?
What are the security issues associated with this policy?
. Include comprehensive speaker notes. For help, consult the guide on how to create speaker notes from Microsoft®. Format your presentation to ensure that the slide titles reflect the objective to which they are responding and only contain essential information. Slides should follow the objectives in the order as listed above. Slides should contain bullet notes that highlight your information, but your speaker notes convey the details you would give if you were presenting. Include a slide with APA-formatted references. Cite a minimum of two peer-reviewed or similar scholarly references beyond the course texts and associated learning activities to support your analysis. Scholarly sources are publications from professional organizations that are written by academics or other experts which contribute to knowledge in a particular field. Please review the document titled, “Unacceptable web sources,” found in the Course Resources section of the classroom. Your best source for scholarly material is the university library. Include a slide with APA-formatted references.
Include Introduction
Include Conclusion
No major Grammar Issues
Please follow the assignment instructions
The post University of Maine at Fort Kent Rocks and Tectonic Setting Questions first appeared on .
