Assessment brief/s:
• Summative Written assignment: [50% of module, 100% grade] [2000 words]
Students will examine the role of leadership in the development of a service improvement programme within a defined area of practice. Students will select an appropriate quality improvement approach and examine the role of leadership and development of others to improve patient experience and outcomes.
• Assessment of Practice: completion of Part 3 Pan London Practice assessment document [50% of module, Pass/Fail] [2000-word equivalent].
• Both components of assessment need to be passed in order to pass the module.
• Formative activities: formative assessment and feedback will occur in the form of peer-review during sessional meetings.
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and Assessments
Before approaching any assessment you should read the student guidance on the use of GenAI: Welcome to your generative AI guidance
This will ensure you are aware of the ethical, legal and learning aspects of using GenAI for your studies.
Each module’s assessments will require a different approach to the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI). Your Module Lead has evaluated this module’s assessment(s) using the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS).
You can learn more about the AIAS at aiassessmentscale.com.
If you would like to understand more about how CCCU’s staff understand the use of GenAI in your learning, you can read the Staff Guidance.
|
1 |
No AI |
The assessment is You must not use |
|
2 |
AI Planning |
AI may be used for You may use AI for |
|
3 |
AI Collaboration |
AI may be used to You may use AI to |
|
4 |
Full AI |
AI may be used to You may use AI |
|
5 |
AI Exploration |
AI is used You should use AI |
|
Perkins, Furze, |
||
Staff Guidance available at the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale webpage
Your Module Lead has evaluated this module’s assessments as requiring the following level of interaction with GenAI:
Assessment 1:
Assessment 2:
At CCCU all assessments require a declaration regarding the level of GenAI use.
Under CCCU’s Academic Integrity Policy unacknowledged inclusion of GenAI is considered academic misconduct. See the Academic Integrity and Misconduct webpages for more information.
Please select the most appropriate statement from the choice below and insert it at the start of your work:
- No GenAI was used in the preparation, planning or creation of this work. [AIAS Level 1]
- I acknowledge the use of outputs from [insert the name of generative AI tool(s) used] in the learning, preparation, planning or proofreading of this work. [AIAS Level 2]
- I acknowledge collaboration with [insert the name of generative AI tool(s) used] in this work, and the inclusion of outputs in modified form. [AIAS Level 3]
- I acknowledge [insert the name of generative AI tool(s) used] as partner(s) in the creation of this work. [AIAS Levels 4 & 5]
Referencing GenAI
If your assessment is rated at levels 2, 3 or 4, you are required to reference where you have used GenAI outputs in the body of your work. For guidance on how to reference GenAI in your work see Cite Them Right 13th Edn, or later. You can use the textbook or visit the Cite Them Right website – both are accessible via LibrarySearch (for the web version, login using your CCCU email).
You can speak to your module tutor, module lead, subject Librarian or Learning Developer [job titles subject to change] for more guidance on the use of GenAI in your learning and assessment.
Reassessment information: the text below is for all handbooks
Some students may not pass an assessment first time and will be invited to take reassessment for the module, following a decision from a Board of Examiners. Do check the Your Guide to Assessment and Award Processes and seek advice from your Personal Academic Tutor if this is the case for you. Your module team will offer support in preparation for your reassessment.
In this case, the nature of the reassessment will be:
|
Original This should be identical to the assessment table |
Reassessment type Usually, the same type of assessment and brief, but |
Deadline for submission of reassessment, and where it If no exact date is known, provide a week e.g., w/c 12 |
|
1. Written |
Quality |
1st |
|
2. Completion |
Completion |
TBC |
This handbook should be read in conjunction with other sources:
· Student Course Handbook: for course academic information applying to all modules
· Current Student Webpages: for generic student experience information
Learning Materials/Resources: From autumn 2025, module resource lists will be provided through TalisAspire. Module leads are asked to ensure that their TalisApsire lists are updated and correct (please contact library services if you require help), and the link to the list is shared in your module handbook as well as on your module Blackboard.
• Recommended Resources:
Journals
• Nursing Standard http://journals.rcni.com/journal/ns
• Health Service Journal https://www.hsj.co.uk/
• Evidence -Based Nursing https://ebn.bmj.com/
• The International Journal of Practice Development http://www.fons.org/library/about-ipdj.aspx
• Journal of Advanced Nursing https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13652648
• Journal of Interprofessional Care https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ijic20
• Nursing Management (RCNi) https://rcni.com/nursing-management
Websites
• The Health Foundation https://www.health.org.uk/
• The Kings Fund https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/
• NHS London leadership academy
https://www.londonleadershipacademy.nhs.uk/leadershiptoolkit/leading-and-managing-others/developing-others
• NHS Scotland Quality Improvement Hub http://www.qihub.scot.nhs.uk/home.aspx
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance
• Point of Care Foundation https://www.pointofcarefoundation.org.uk/resource/experience-based-co-design-ebcd-toolkit/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIw5240YLl3QIVWIfVCh1CMgyzEAAYASAAEgLOSvD_BwE
• The Health Foundation
https://www.health.org.uk/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIrMPomOD23QIVzrvtCh0a6gSrEAAYASAAEgLG2vD_BwE
Date and validity July 2025, valid for academic year 2025/2026