RES 832 Grand Canyon University Quantitative Methodology Essay – Description
Please provide a well articulated response to each of the peer responses to the discussion questions. I have included the discussion questions 1 & 2 for context only. Each response should be at least 250 words and include at least one reference and citation in APA 7th edition format.
Topic 2 DQ 1 – Think again of that study on the predictive relationships of high school principals’ leadership styles and academic achievement in their schools in your state. The instrumentation must be aligned with the research questions and study design and must be feasible for administration of the study. How do you identify instruments appropriate for use with GCU core quantitative research designs? How might you address concerns about the influence of instrumentation on study feasibility? Do you have any ethical concerns about recruitment and data collection? Explain.
Xesus’s response:
Deciding upon instrumentation that aligns with research questions, and the study design could be a challenge. Instrumentation utilization within a study should always be: feasible, ethical, and compatible (Garcia et al., 2020) . It is imperative to remember that when a researcher facilitated quantitative research. Researchers at Grand Canyon University have to choose instruments that align with their research questions. For instance, researchers have to consider the real-world practicalities of the project, and have consider and abide by ethical standards. This includes considering the ability of the instruments to align with the research question; as well as the feasibility of using them given time/resource constraints, and issues related to obtaining informed consent and protecting participants’ confidentiality. Researchers should also try to be culturally sensitive and responsible by acknowledging and addressing barriers, which sometimes might include instrument selection (Jones et al., 2021. Ultimately, choosing the correct tools for data collection and analysis requires rigorous planning and attention to detail, but these efforts are crucial to producing high-quality, impactful research.
Garcia, M. S., Jones, L. A., & Brown, M. J. (2020). Instrumentation utilization in research: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Research, 113(5), 425-436.
Jones, S. J., Powell, E. J., & Wilson, D. R. (2021). The impact of instrumentation on research quality: A meta-analysis. Research in Nursing & Health, 43(2), 151-163.
Duy’s Response:
Quantitative methodology is mostly about the measurements, along with the statistical and numerical analysis of data that are collected through polls, close-ended questionnaires, and surveys along with the analysis of data from previous research. Based on the nature of the research topic, researchers will be able to choose the appropriate research design and instrumentations, including descriptive, correlational, comparative, and experimental. Despite the fact that each research design will be using different approaches and instruments for the collection of data, researchers are required to make sure that their research and data collection are processed with honesty and integrity. The honesty and integrity of the research process not only ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data, but also ensures the safety and confidentiality of the participants, or research targets (Nicholls, 2021). Researchers also need to be reminded that the research, along with the honesty in the data is all for the benefit, safety, and well-being of the public, not for any personal interest or greed. Moreover, besides the integrity of the report of data, researchers need to ensure that their research topic is doable with the availability of resources (Pearson et al., 2020). The reason for the feasibility of the topic is to ensure that there will be enough funds for the research and that the institution won’t waste any money on research that won’t have any results in the end.
Nicholls, S. G. (2021). Research integrity: Emphasising our commitment. Research Ethics, 17(3), 265–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211028740
Pearson, N., Naylor, P.-J., Ashe, M. C., Fernandez, M., Yoong, S. L., & Wolfenden, L. (2020). Guidance for conducting feasibility and pilot studies for implementation trials. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 6(1), 167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00634-w
Topic 2 DQ 2 – Imagine again that you are an automotive manufacturing executive tasked with increasing sales in your state. You wish to assess the effectiveness of an incentive program for sales personnel implemented at 10 dealerships in medium-size cities and 10 dealerships in small cities. What three data collection approaches are most feasible for such a study? What are the most significant strengths and weaknesses of these data collection approaches? Why are these significant? What concerns do you have about the feasibility of implementing these approaches to data collection for this study? Explain.
Xesus’s Response:
Deciding upon which data collection approach is most feasible can be a challenge. In my opinion, there are three primary methods that can be utilized: interviews, surveys, and data evaluations. Surveying a considerable number of individuals can be very feasible as it is both economical and time-efficient (Harris et al., 2020). However, this method might not identify hidden elements outside of sales statistics, such as consumer fulfillment or worker spirits. Interviewing sales staff members and management professionals can supply deep insight into how the motivation programme affected them directly. Data evaluation are also a good option (Wilson et al., 2021). But they often need additional time and assets; still, it enables analysts to probe farther by offering opportunities for clarification and collecting intricate data. Nonetheless, biases introduced by the investigator can undermine the dependability of the outcomes obtained via this technique. Therefore, combining diverse strategies increases validity, although each one has limitations that have to be taken into consideration.
Harris, J. L., Wenzel, A. S., & Martin, J. L. (2020). The impact of data collection methods on survey response rates. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 50(1), 1-11.
Wilson, D. R., Jones, S. J., & Powell, E. J. (2021). The use of social media data for research: A review of methods and issues. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 143-160.
Duy’s Response:
In order to research and investigate the effectiveness of an incentive program for sales personnel and their sales performance by using the quantitative methodology, there will be three main approaches to collect the data, including questionnaires/surveys, interviews, and observations. First of all, with the questionnaires/surveys researchers can provide the employees with the form that they can evaluate both the incentive program and their performance in sales; along with the form for the employees, customers need to be provided with their own form to rate the performance and services that they receive from the employees, the form can contain close-ended questions, and/or multiple choices. By using questionnaires/surveys, researchers will be able to collect the result in a short amount of time, and less expensive in the providing of instrumentation (Einola & Alvesson, 2021). Next, with the interviews, researchers will provide the questions and record the verbal answers from the research targets. This approach not only helps the research targets to able to express their experiences but also helps researchers to record and find a way for improve for the scenario (Busetto et al., 2020). Then, with the observations, researchers will observe and compare the incentives and the employees’ sales performance between the 10 dealerships in medium-sized cities and 10 dealerships in small cities, along with their customers. The observations will allow researchers to find appropriate improvements for each dealership in both medium and small cities (Rezigalla, 2020). However, despite the advantage of each approach, there are still concerns over their weaknesses and feasibility. For the weaknesses, all three of the approaches might cause the accuracy of the data due to the answers of the research targets being full of bias, which can lead to false data or information. Then, time is also one of the biggest concerns that either with a short amount of time, or too much time will be hard to consult and collect the data that needs to improve the employees’ incentives and their sale performance.
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Einola, K., & Alvesson, M. (2021). Behind the numbers: Questioning questionnaires. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30(1), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492620938139
Rezigalla, A. A. (2020). Observational study designs: Synopsis for selecting an appropriate study design. Cureus, 12(1), e6692. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6692
The post RES 832 Grand Canyon University Quantitative Methodology Essay first appeared on .
