Please respond to discussion below using current APA edition and 2 scholarly references. Must be at least 150 words. During my recent clinical rotation, I encountered a multitude of cases that underscored the importance of conducting thorough assessments and exercising critical thinking skills. Navigating through a clinic that predominantly serves older patients with a plethora of comorbidities posed initial challenges, as the signs and symptoms they presented with often pointed towards a myriad of potential disease processes. However, with the invaluable guidance of my preceptor, I quickly acclimated to the fast-paced environment and was able to adeptly manage the complexities inherent in such patient demographics.
One particularly memorable case involved an 82-year-old African American female with an extensive medical history including type 2 diabetes, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, hyperthyroidism, and hypertension. She presented with complaints of sharp, tingling lower back pain that had been radiating to her hips for the past six months, accompanied by mild difficulty in ambulation due to the discomfort. Both my preceptor and I suspected sciatic nerve involvement based on her clinical presentation. However, abnormal results in her blood work, specifically elevated levels of creatinine, BUN, and calcium, prompted us to delve deeper into the diagnostic process. Consequently, we decided to refer her for spinal X-rays to confirm our preliminary diagnosis. To manage her pain, she was prescribed meloxicam 5mg PO BID and educated on the importance of adhering to the prescribed medication regimen, as well as utilizing a heating pad to alleviate inflammation. Given the complexity of her medical history, we also considered alternative diagnoses such as spinal stenosis, which could exacerbate her symptoms due to spinal degeneration (Goldsmith et al., 2019). Diabetic Neuropathy was another plausible explanation, given her history of type 2 diabetes, which could manifest as radiating pain in the lower limbs (Nordheim & Jenssen, 2021). Additionally, peripheral vascular disease was considered, given her advanced age and history of hypertension, potentially contributing to her ambulatory difficulties (Jaul & Barron, 2017).
In light of her multifaceted medical conditions and associated risk factors, we prioritized implementing various health promotion strategies to optimize her overall well-being. These strategies encompassed educating her on the importance of glycemic control through medication adherence, regular blood glucose monitoring, and adhering to a balanced diet. Furthermore, we emphasized the significance of managing blood pressure and blood sugar levels to decelerate the progression of kidney disease, alongside advocating for regular kidney function tests to monitor renal health. In addition, we tailored a safe and feasible exercise regimen to her individual capabilities, advocating for gentle activities such as walking and stretching to enhance mobility and mitigate the risk of complications associated with her myriad of conditions.
This clinical encounter served as a poignant reminder of the indispensable role of interdisciplinary collaboration in delivering comprehensive patient care. Engaging with other healthcare professionals, consulting specialists, and fostering collaboration within a multidisciplinary team framework proved instrumental in navigating the complexities of managing patients with multiple chronic conditions. Also, addressing medication management in such patients necessitates a nuanced understanding of potential drug interactions, side effects, and contraindications, further underscoring the importance of effective communication and coordination among healthcare providers.
Drawing from evidence-based guidelines and recommendations, such as those provided by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) for glycemic control and the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline for blood pressure management in chronic kidney disease patients, informed our approach to patient care (Reynolds et al., 2018). Additionally, leveraging evidence-based dietary guidelines from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics facilitated tailored dietary recommendations to effectively manage the patient’s complex medical conditions (Reynolds et al., 2018).
This clinical experience exemplified the intricate interplay between comprehensive assessment, critical thinking, and interdisciplinary collaboration in providing optimal care for patients with complex medical histories and multiple comorbidities. By prioritizing patient education, implementing tailored health promotion strategies, and leveraging evidence-based guidelines, advanced practice nurses can empower patients to actively participate in their care and achieve improved health outcomes amidst the intricate tapestry of chronic disease management.
The post Please respond to discussion below using current APA edition and 2 scholarly ref appeared first on Scholars Hub Blog.
