LUC The Seminar Content and Evaluation of The Research Design Essay – Description
Post an assessment of the seminar content and evaluation of the research design. Your post should address the following:
How does the research and content presented in this course inform or relate to your individual Doctoral Study? What research methods or strategic analysis approaches might be useful in answering the questions that you have posed?
Consider the articles you have read and evaluate how the methods of data collection, research statistics employed, and overall research designs have enlightened your individual approach to research. Is there anything about your approach to your individual research that the literature in this seminar has reinforced or confirmed?
Were you exposed to any new sources of data that will be useful in your Doctoral Study? Be specific in your answer.
How do you view yourself as a global change agent in light of the topics covered in this seminar course?
Recommended Readings
Girgenti, R. H., & Hedley, T. P. (Eds.). (2016). The new era of regulatory enforcement. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Chapter 2 “Raising the Bar: A Framework for Managing Risk” (Review pp. 44–46)
Chapter 3, “Bribery and Corruption” (Review pp. 92–93)
Banerjee, S., & Roy, S. (2014). Examining the dynamics of whistleblowing: A causal approach.Links to an external site. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 13(2), 7–26.
Bartlett, A. (2014). Remaining blasé about foreign corrupt practices law is an increasingly risky game.Links to an external site. Governance Directions, 66(8), 472–477.
Drake, J. R. (2016). Asking for Facebook logins: An egoist case for privacy.Links to an external site. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 429–441. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2586-4
Dunham, L. M., Jorgensen, R., & Washer, K. (2016). Securities lending activities in mutual funds and ETFs: Ethical considerations.Links to an external site. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(1), 21–28. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2609-1
Karaibrahimoglu, Y. Z., & Cangarli, B. G. (2016). Do auditing and reporting standards affect firms’ ethical behaviours? The moderating role of national culture.Links to an external site. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(1), 55–75. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2571-y
Ma’ayan, Y., & Carmeli, A. (2016). Internal audits as a source of ethical behavior, efficiency, and effectiveness in work units.Links to an external site. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(2), 347–363. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2561-0
McGee, J., & Byington, J. R. (2016). M&A due diligence: Consideration of fraudulent financial statements.Links to an external site. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 27(2), 17–21. doi:10.1002/jcaf.22117
Melnik, T. (2016). Beyond HIPAA: Privacy and security due diligence in health care transactions.Links to an external site. Journal of Health Care Compliance, 18(1), 45–48.
Sherer, J. A., Hoffman, T. M., Wallace, K. M., Ortiz, E. E., & Satnick, T. J. (2016). Merger and acquisition due diligence part II–The devil in the details.Links to an external site. Richmond Journal of Law and Technology, 22(2), 1–61.
The post LUC The Seminar Content and Evaluation of The Research Design Essay first appeared on .
