Learning Outcome Evidence of Critical Thinking Essay
You have had the nurse practitioner core courses of Advanced Pathophysiology, Advanced Pharmacology, and now Advanced Health/Physical Assessment (3Ps). Provide a reflection in writing or audio addressing the following questions: How confident do you feel in your level of knowledge on the 3Ps? What plans do you have for applying the 3Ps foundational knowledge into your practicum courses here at WCU? Learning Outcome Evidence of Critical Thinking Essay
ORDER HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
NURS 681 Discussion Board
NURS 681 Discussion Board
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Response Timing
4 pts
Proficient
On time (posted by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. of the week in which assigned)
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Late (did not submit by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. of the week in which assigned)
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence of Critical Thinking: Initial Responses to Discussion Prompt(s)
10 to >9.2 pts
Proficient
Applies course content sufficiently by expanding on the main points of the prompt. Responses exhibit critical thinking and analysis. There is a significant correlation to course materials, national guidelines, and evidence-based research. Learning Outcome Evidence of Critical Thinking Essay
9.2 to >8.2 pts
Acceptable
Content knowledge is exhibited by identification of the main topics. There is some evidence of critical thinking and analysis. Responses may be insufficient or lacking in detail.
8.2 to >7.5 pts
Needs Improvement
An understanding of content knowledge is poorly exhibited and insufficient in critical thinking, analysis, and detail. Some main discussion topics are not covered, or they significantly digress from the topic at hand.
7.5 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
An initial response is missing or provides no indication of understanding. Main topics are not covered.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWord Count Initial Post
2 to >1.0 pts
Proficient
The initial post is 300 words or more. Learning Outcome Evidence of Critical Thinking Essay
1 to >0.0 pts
Acceptable
n/a You will either receive 100 or 0.
0 pts
Needs Improvement
n/a You will either receive 100 or 0.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
The initial post has fewer than 300 words.
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFrequency of Participation and Minimum Posting Requirements
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
Responses to peers’ initial posts occur throughout the week with replies to peers and/or instructors present on two or more days. A minimum of 2 replies on 2 separate days per weekly prompt is evident.
3 to >1.0 pts
Acceptable
n/a You will either receive 100 or 0.
1 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
n/a You will either receive 100 or 0. Learning Outcome Evidence of Critical Thinking Essay
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Responses to peersâ€
initial posts do not occur throughout the week with replies to peers and/or instructors present on two or more days. Less than a minimum of 2 replies on 2 separate days per weekly prompt is evident.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence of Critical Thinking:<br>Responses to Peers and/or Instructors
11 to >10.12 pts
Proficient
Well-developed and insightful replies provide an opportunity for response. Responses promote discussion either by sharing prior knowledge and experiences, making meaningful connections with course content, asking meaningful questions, or challenging viewpoints. There is a significant correlation of student ideas to course materials, national guidelines, and evidence-based research. Learning Outcome Evidence of Critical Thinking Essay
10.12 to >9.02 pts
Acceptable
Somewhat developed replies provide some opportunity for response. Responses contribute to the discussion either by sharing prior knowledge and experiences, making connections with course content, or asking questions.
9.02 to >8.25 pts
Needs Improvement
Poorly developed replies provide little or no opportunity for response. Responses do little to contribute to the discussion.
8.25 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Responses are severely limited; no critical thought is present. Learning Outcome Evidence of Critical Thinking Essay
11 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics
9 to >8.28 pts
Proficient
The writing is clear, concise, formal, and organized. Responses contain a maximum of 2 errors in spelling and grammar. Sources are paraphrased, referenced, and cited correctly in current APA style in all but 1 or 2 instances.
8.28 to >7.38 pts Learning Outcome Evidence of Critical Thinking Essay
Acceptable
The writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Responses contain 3- to 5 errors in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Sources are paraphrased, referenced, and cited correctly in current APA in all but 3 or 4 instances.
7.38 to >6.75 pts
Needs Improvement
The writing is unclear and unorganized. Responses contain more than 5 errors in spelling and grammar that detract from the readability of the paper. Sources are missing or they are improperly cited; APA style is barely evident. Learning Outcome Evidence of Critical Thinking Essay
6.75 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Extensive errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension, and/or the writing includes slang or is inappropriate for academic discourse. APA style is not evident.
9 pts
Total Points: 40 Learning Outcome Evidence of Critical Thinking Essay
