“Hybrid warfare is difficult to defend against but seldom decisive in interstate conflicts.”: The Analysis of Defence and Security Policies Assignment, MU

Question – “Hybrid warfare is difficult to defend against but seldom decisive in interstate conflicts.” Argue for or against this statement using suitable case studies.

Introduction

Brief overview: a brief introduction to hybrid warfare, mentioning its components (conventional, irregular, and cyber warfare, along with influence operations)
Thesis statement: stating a position on the assertion that “ hybrid warfare is difficult to defend against but seldom decisive in interstate conflicts”
Brief outline structure of my essay

Definition

Definition and Components:

Define hybrid warfare and describe its key components and strategies.
Define interstate conflict (possible expansion beyond armed conflict, but also dispute over sovereignty or other issues of national interest), to be scoped clearly

Challenges in Defense: Explain why hybrid warfare is difficult to defend against, including its unpredictable nature and the broad spectrum of tactics used.

The post “Hybrid warfare is difficult to defend against but seldom decisive in interstate conflicts.”: The Analysis of Defence and Security Policies Assignment, MU appeared first on Singapore Assignment Help.