Arizona State University The Morality of Everyday Life Paper – Description
There are three questions. The requirements are identical to those for the essays you’ve already been submitting, except that each of the three answers should be 1000 – 1200 words, for a total word count of 3000 – 3600 words, and you can submit it as either an MSWord doc or a PDF
Please send all three of your answers in a single file. The name of the file should begin with your last name.
THE QUESTIONS
1. Think about a student who has not taken this course and is not majoring in any related discipline. Staying within the word limits, write a high-level summary of the content of this course. Your essay should not merely cram in as much information in as possible, but rather you should provide a systematic and coherent picture of as much course content as possible and how it all fits together. Note that thinking about how you will approach this task (i.e., thinking about how all the information fits together) is a key part of doing well on this essay.
2. Congratulations. You just got hired by the Google robotics team, which is building humanoid robots that are indistinguishable from people, and that are going to be put into human society. You’re leading a team that is responsible for programming these robots to have a moral psychology. There are two types of robots, each for a different task:
THRIVE: Their goal is to thrive as individuals —to become successful and rich and influential.
COMMUNITY: Their goal is for the whole community that they are in to do well.
What sort of moral psychology would you give to these robots that would help them achieve their tasks? How would you program a THRIVE robot differently from a COMMUNITY robot?
3. Reddit has a section in which people write in with something that they did and ask if they are morally in the wrong. You can find this here: https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/
Please choose one case that you believe is interesting/difficult (not one with an obvious answer), and then show how the research and theories discussed in the course can help resolve the issue. What I’m looking for here is a serious attempt to bring the course material to bear on a real-world moral dilemma, and you should try to integrate as much of the relevant material as possible. (Don’t just talk about utilitarianism and deontology, for instance.) You should discuss both theoretical issues and empirical research.
Your answer should begin with a link to the case (I’ll read it myself, do not summarize) and end with your verdict: Is this person morally wrong? YES or NO.
The post Arizona State University The Morality of Everyday Life Paper first appeared on .
