ARC Philosophy The Connection Between Justice and Utility Discussion – Description
write a discussion post entry for their Canvas discussion group on any reading assigned for the week in which the post is due raising an objection against an author.
This is for a completion grade and is practice for you to develop your own ideas and objections. The grading rubric only will be on whether you satisfy the sentence count requirement, write out the opponent’s claim, and if you attempt an original objection against the relevant writer. You won’t be graded on whether your objection is a good or bad one. See this as an exercise where you have the freedom without worry to develop your ideas and think for yourself, which are important traits in life. Become the best version of yourself. It’s as if you were raising your hand in class to make a comment, where your grade won’t be affected by the correctness of your comment. It’s merely a completion or participation grade.
Students have freedom in determining what they want to write about within the cycle. For example, you can object against Hobbes’ view on human nature or on his position that the best form of government is an absolute monarchy. This is due by Wednesday 1159PM of the week and will be out of 6 points/week. Students must also write a separate response entry that responds to a fellow student’s comment in the group. This second entry is due by Friday at 11:59PM of that week and will be out of an additional 4 points/week.
The first post should try to provide a good original criticism of the reading. It must be a minimum of 7 clear sentences with all substance. Start off by stating the claim made by an author that you will object against. Then provide your objection against the author with depth and clarity. You need to title the first post as “1st Post.”
The second post should try to provide a good original objection specifically against a fellow student’s idea in your group. It must be a new objection. Do not object to a philosopher that the student is talking about. Rather, you must object against the student’s idea or conclusion. For example, if a student writes a post on Plato. Don’t object against Plato. Rather, object against what the student said about Plato.
The post ARC Philosophy The Connection Between Justice and Utility Discussion first appeared on .
