NU673 Units 2 and 8 PMHNP Journal

Criteria 1

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 9.6

Level I Max

Points: 7.2

Not Present

0 Points

Content of Paper

●      
Demonstrates a well-articulated
understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative
manner

●      
Develops content and theories
are well

●      
Links content to the paper
requirements and practical experience

●      
Includes relevant material that
fulfills all objectives of the paper

●      
Uses scholarly resources that
were not provided in the course materials

●      
Completes all instruction
requirements

●      
Demonstrates an understanding of
the subject matter

●      
Explains and applies knowledge
of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role

●      
Uses a variety of scholarly
resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the
course materials

●      
Includes relevant material that
fulfills all objectives of the paper.

●      
Completes all instruction
requirements

●      
Demonstrates a moderate
understanding of the subject matter

●      
Summarizes content with minimal
application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development

●      
Presents content but is missing
depth and or development

●      
Uses only scholarly resources
that were provided in the course materials
Completes most instruction requirements

●      
Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 9.6

Level I Max

Points: 7.2

Not Present

0 Points

Analysis and
Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning

●      
Provides critical analysis in an
accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content

●      
Synthesizes information from
scholarly resources

●      
Provides new information or
insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and
alternative information or viewpoints

●      
Completes all instruction
requirements

●      
Provides evidence of further
synthesis of course content via scholarly resources

●      
Synthesizes information to help
fulfill paper requirements

●      
Supports content with at least
one viewpoint.

●      
Completes all instruction
requirements

●      
Lacks clarification or new
information

●      
Supports content with scholarly
reference without adding any new information or insight

●      
Provides content that may be
confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete

●      
Completes most instruction
requirements

●      
Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max

Points: 8

Level II Max

Points: 6.4

Level I Max

Points: 4.8

Not Present

0 Points

Application of
Knowledge

●      
Offers a multidisciplinary
approach via scholarly resources

●      
Applies practice that is
accurate and plausible

●      
Supports practice with
additional scholarly resources

●      
Answers all questions posed
within the assignment in a well-developed manner with citations for
validation

●      
Completes all instruction
requirements

●      
Presents a summary of the
paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained

●      
Indicates how the information
will be used within their professional practice

●      
Completes all instruction
requirements

●      
Lacks objective criteria

●      
Applies superficial bridge
between the assignment and the broader course content

●      
Indicates how they will apply
this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner

●      
Completes most instruction
requirements

●      
Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max

Points: 4

Level II Max

Points: 3.2

Level I Max

Points: 2.4

Not Present

0 Points

Organization

●      
Provides well-organized content
with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument

●      
Provides concise writing with a
logical flow of ideas

●      
Provides organized content with
an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement

●      
Provides argument content with
minimal issues in content flow

●      
Provides poor organization, and
flow of ideas distract from content

●      
Provides a purpose statement

●      
Provides narrative that is
difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work

●      
Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max

Points: 4

Level II Max

Points: 3.2

Level I Max

Points: 2.4

Not Present

0 Points

College-level
academic writing

●      
Includes no more than three
grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the
readability

●      
Includes no more than
four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere
with the readability

●      
Includes five or more
grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of
assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability

●      
Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

40

32

24

0

Minimum Total Points

33 points
minimum

25 points
minimum

1 point minimum

0

Assignment
Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria
1

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Content Reflection

●      
Reflection demonstrates a high
degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and evaluating key course
concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities,
and/or assignments.

●      
Insightful and relevant
connections made through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples.

●      
Answers all the questions in the
self-reflection video prompt.

●      
Reflection demonstrates some
degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key
course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions
activities, and/or assignments.

●      
Connections made through
explanations, inferences, and/or examples.

●      
Answers only part of the
questions in the self-reflection video prompt.

●      
Reflection demonstrates limited
critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course
concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions,
activities, and/or assignments

●      
Minimal connections made through
explanations, inferences, and/or examples.

●      
Answers only a few of the
questions in the self-reflection video prompt.

●      
Does not meet the criteria.

Criteria
2

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Personal
Growth

●      
Conveys strong evidence of
reflection on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment
questions posed.

●      
Demonstrates significant
personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made
examples, well-developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and
challenges.

●      
Synthesizes current experience
into future implications.

●      
Conveys evidence of reflection
on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment questions posed.

●      
Demonstrates satisfactory
personal growth and awareness through some inferences made, examples,
insights, and challenges.

●      
Some thought of the future
implications of current experience.

●      
Conveys limited evidence of
reflection on own work in response to the self-assessment questions posed.

●      
Demonstrates less than adequate
personal growth and awareness through few or simplistic inferences made,
examples, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed.

●      
Minimal thought of the future
implications of current experience.

●      
 

Criteria
3

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Quality

Includes all of the following:

●      
Excellent presentation. Is well
lighted with face visible.

●      
Clear diction when
communicating.

●      
Professionalism is present.

Includes all of the following:

●      
Above average presentation.

●      
Area is lighted for visibility,
clear diction and communication used.

●      
Professionalism present.

Includes all of the following:

●      
Casual presentation and
communication.

●      
Professionalism needs
improvement.

●      
Does not meet the criteria

Criteria
4

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Timeliness

●      
Journal reflection is completed
within three to five minutes.

●      
Journal reflection is greater
than five minutes or less than two minutes.

●      
Journal reflection is less than
2 minutes

●      
Does not meet the criteria

Maximum
Total Points

20

16

12

0

Minimum
Total Points

17 points minimum

13 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Criteria 1

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Subjective Data

●      
Includes all relevant subjective
data necessary for differentiation of the client’s problem.

●      
Data is presented in a
systematic, organized manner

●      
Includes most subjective data
with omission of two minor details or one major detail.

●      
Most data is presented in a
systematic, organized manner

●      
Includes subjective data but
omits four minor details or two major details.

●      
Some data is presented in a
systematic, organized manner

●      
Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Objective Data

●      
Objective data is complete and
presented in an organized manner

●      
Objective data is complete and
presented in an organized manner most of the time

●     Objective data is not complete or is not presented in an organized manner

●      
Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Assessment

●      
Assessment, including
differential and/or diagnosis (if appropriate), is complete and appropriate
to the client.

●      
Diagnostics are complete and
appropriate to clients

●      
Assessment, including
differential and/or diagnosis (if appropriate), is complete but some may not
be appropriate for clients

●      
Assessment, including
differential and/or diagnosis (if appropriate), is not complete but is
appropriate

●      
Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Plan

●      
Plan includes all relevant
measures 95% to 100% Pharmacologic Non-pharmacologic Education Referral
Follow-up

●      
Answers all questions applying
evidence-based practice guidelines.

●      
Plan includes all relevant
measures 89% to 94% Pharmacologic Non-Pharmacologic Education Referral
Follow-up

●      
Answers a few questions applying
evidence-based practice guidelines.

●      
Plan includes four of the five
relevant measures, but the four are complete.

●      
Answers a few questions. Lack of
application of evidence-based practice guidelines.

●      
Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max

Points: 6

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Professional

Application

●       Case incorporates three (3) evidence-based
practice articles from the past five (5) years

●       Case incorporates two (2) evidence-based
practice articles from the past five (5) years

●       Case incorporates only one (1) evidence-based
practice article from the past five (5) years or has any number of
non-evidenced-based articles with no evidenced-based articles

●       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 6

Level III Max

Points: 6

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

College-level
academic writing

●      
Includes no more than three
grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the
readability.

●      
Meets the assignment length
requirements

●      
Includes no more than
four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere
with the readability

●      
Meets the length requirements

●      
Includes five or more
grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of
assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability

●      
Meets the length requirements

●      
Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

60

40

30

0

Minimum Total Points

41 points
minimum

31 points
minimum

1 point minimum

0

Assignment
Criteria

Level III Max

Level II Max

Level I Max

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III

Points: 60

Level II

Points: 48

Level I

Points: 36

Not Present

0 Points

Total Score

●      
Obtains a total score between
81% to 100% on the virtual reality patient scenario

●      
Obtains a total score between
61% to 80% on the virtual reality patient scenario

●      
Obtains a total score between
41% to 60% on the virtual reality patient scenario

●      
Does not attempt patient
scenario

●      
Obtains a total score of 40% or
below

●      
Does not meet the criteria

Maximum
Total Points

60 points

48 points

36 points

0 points

Minimum
Total Points

60 points

48 points

36 points

0 points